Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law Firm

The William Morris Agency, Creative Artist Agency (CAA) and “The Evil Side of The Entertainment Industry”.

2012-01-03T10:51:00.000-08:00

Folks if you do not know the Story of Sony allegedly involved in the Murder of Michael Jackson for his "Collection" then look deep. The Wall of Corruption in the Court System needs to be exposed and stopped. Demand Transparency and Accountability.

I have corresponded with insiders in this case for years and discussed New York Judges that are part of the corruption and no where near part of the solution. Knowledge is Power. This article was sent to me today by Leonard Rowe, it is an important story. I write on massive corruption in New York and the Tech and Media Companies such as Sony that are above the law and seem to be NOT above anything to keep their rights to Billions. Sony was also involved in the 13 Trillion Dollar iViewit Technology Theft.

The Christine Anderson Whistleblower case in New York proves years of New York courts whitewashing for elite law firms and still nothing is done. The Iviewit case is exposing Andrew Cuomo while he was the New York Attorney General and now as the New York Governor. The Culture of Corruption in New York and well, really in the US Court System everywhere has to first be exposed, acknowledged that there is a massive problem and only then can we begin to take down this Massive Wall of Corruption.

"CORRUPTION IN OUR FEDERAL COURTS

In my previous two (2) CNN IReports we focused on the hypocrisy of Oregon’s Governor on the death penalty and how the U.S. Congress stole the right of federal review from every American Citizen.

Today I want to address problems that are inherent in the judicial system itself in terms of the failure and inability of judges to accord equal protection of the law and impartial application of the law in cases that involve African-American citizens when they come up against rich, powerful corporate entities or, as more often the case, the “State”.

I was given a copy of the book “What Really Happened to Michael Jackson-The King of Pop” that was written by Leonard Rowe.

I was intrigued by the title and of course being a big fan of Michael Jackson, I decided to embark on my own course of research to check out and confirm several of the items contained in the book. This book can be found and acquired at www.whatreallyhappenedtomj.com.

Of primary interest was that part of the book that dealt with “The Evil Side of The Entertainment Industry”.

In this section of the book it addressed the curious case of Leonard Rowe and the Black Promoters Association (BPA) who had filed a lawsuit against The William Morris Agency, Creative Artist Agency (CAA) and others involved in the concert promotion business (Rowe Entertainment, et al v. William Morris, et al).

This case was brought by Mr. Rowe and four (4) others and involved the largest effort to date to bring about a sense of fairness in the live concert promotion side of the entertainment industry.

As I researched this case and continued to read the story in the book, I could not believe what I was reading and discovering about this situation. At the time that this lawsuit was filed and being prosecuted in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of NY it was assigned to and being heard by the Honorable Robert P. Patterson.

Mr. Rowe and his group of Black Concert Promoters across America were thought to be ably represented by Martin Gold, Ray Heslin and later by the law firm of famed Black Attorney Willie E. Gary.

The other side was represented by some of the best and most expensive law firms in America. Loeb &; Loeb, Weil, Gotcher, et al., and other blue chip, well heeled law firms.

As I understand the story, Mr. Rowe, who was the President and one of the founding members of the Black Promoters Association (BPA) had discovered, with many of his colleagues, that they were being forced to pay a 50% deposit, up front, to secure certain acts and artists to perform at concert venues across the country. This becomes more and more significant when they discovered that White concert promoters were being charged 0-10% deposit for the same artist in the same geographical venues. In addition, Black concert promoters were saddled with other extraneous contractual provisions relative to percentages of ticket sales that White concert promoters were not subjected to. Finally, Mr. Rowe and his team of colleagues discovered that despite their best efforts and no matter how much money they put up front, they were never allowed to secure a contract to tour or promote a White artist or act, ever.

But White concert promoters were not only allowed but actively encouraged to promote both white and black artists without any of the sideline contract provisions that Black concert promoters were saddled with.

Another concern that was observed was that after an artist had been cultivated and groomed by Black concert promoters, the music industry executives at The William Morris Agency and Creative Artist Agency would literally preclude Black concert promoters from touring these acts, such as Lionel Richie, Janet Jackson, Michael Jackson whom Mr. Rowe had toured since the days of the Jacksons, all of a sudden, Mr. Rowe can’t book a date with Michael Jackson, Lionel Richie, Whitney Houston, Janet Jackson or any other successful cross over act that happened to have been African-American as only the White concert promoters were deemed “qualified” to promote these shows.

This disparity had plagued the Black concert promoters and the black business community for decades until they felt that they had suffered and endured enough. They decided to take action to address their concerns.

Mr. Rowe wrote letter after letter to music industry executives at talent and booking agencies, The William Morris Agency, Creative Artists Agency (CAA) and others in an effort to address and hopefully ameliorate the atrocious disparities that they had observed, endured and documented and in all of his extensive efforts, the results were futile.

Not only did the music industry executives thumb their noses, turn a deaf ear and blind eye to the very legitimate concerns that were raised, but Mr. Rowe and several of his colleagues were noticing a “tightening of the noose” with even more stringent and problematic contractual provisions being forced upon them.

New York based Attorney Martin Gold in a clear violation of state bar rules and regulations, sought out and solicited Mr. Rowe and his organization and pitched the services of his law firm, Gold, Farrell &; Marks (which then became known as Rubin, Baum and they later merged with Sonneschien, Nath &; Rosenthal) to represent the interests of the Black Promoters Association, Mr. Rowe and the four (4) other individually named plaintiffs.

Now initially this seemed like a good idea for the plaintiffs but as time went on, it became painfully clear that Martin Gold had his own agenda and the plaintiffs were merely “a means to an end” for which their interests would be wholly subverted to accomplish a windfall payday for himself at the expense of his clients whom he consciously, deliberately and intentionally threw under the bus.

Leonard Rowe who was the driving force and emotional foundation for moving the lawsuit forward, maintained daily contact with Martin Gold and his associate, Ray Heslin during all phases of the lawsuit, from drafting of the complaint, preparation of witnesses, compilation of documentation of contractual disparities and related matters.

After a lawsuit is filed against a party and they are served with the summons and complaint, they have a certain amount of time to answer or otherwise respond. In federal court that is usually 21 to 30 days depending on the particular location and the local rules of the court where the matter had been filed.

After the time to answer or respond if a party has not responded in a timely manner, the case will be resolved by way of a default judgment. In this case, however, the case went forward into the discovery phase. And this is where things got really interesting or convoluted depending on your point of view.

Martin Gold and his law firm asked Mr. Rowe and his organization to spend over two hundred thousand ($200,000) dollars (which they paid) in order to search and acquire e-mail documentation and evidence in support of their claims of discrimination and contractual disparities that they contended permeated the music industry.

This money was later determined to have been well utilized when the evidence returned documentation that the word “nigger” had been used over 232 separate times by executives at both The William Morris Agency and Creative Artists Agency (CAA).

Imagine that. “Nigger” used over 232 times as these white executives discussed entertainment luminaries such as Oprah Winfrey, Bill Cosby, Halle Berry, Will Smith, Denzel Washington, Samuel L. Jackson, Spike Lee and other noted black entertainers and concert promoters in their inter-office e-mails.

Now if the shoe was on the other foot and there was evidence discovered that denigrated and insulted the Jewish people, mountains would be moved amid the howls and cries of anti-Semitism which would be trumpeted around the country until something was done to correct that deplorable situation and the Jewish community would not rest until these businesses were closed.

Take Rick Sanchez, formally of CNN who was relieved of his on air position for merely voicing his First Amendment opinion that the news media was controlled by “Jewish People”. After his removal from CNN Mr. Sanchez has not been seen or heard of since.

But in the case of black people and the black concert promoters in particular, Judge Robert P. Patterson turned a deaf ear, blind eye, held his nose and swept the evidence under the rug as he entered an order dismissing the case, at the summary judgment level, while at the same time, intentionally ignoring the evidence that black people had been referred to as “nigger” over 232 times, by the White executives of these entertainment industry giants, in their daily business practices.

The summary judgment level in federal court is where the rubber meets the road so to speak in terms of determining whether or not enough evidence that raises disputed fact issues merit a jury trial. The law is clear. If there is a scintilla of evidence then the case must proceed to a jury trial for the determination of any and all factual issues. The standard, legally speaking is that there must not be a genuine issue of material fact remaining and that the moving party defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

And it got worse. The evidence revealed that not only was ‘nigger” used more than 232 times, there was also credible evidence that showed internal memorandums about concerts and venue dates with notations to “keep away from the blacks” and “don’t let the black concert promoters know” about this date or venue or artist. These people also kept away from black concert promoters all information relative to when certain acts and artists would be available in certain geographic venues.

There was also evidence that showed notations found in the files of these defendants that stated that certain information was not to be divulged to “the blacks” and others which clearly stated “no blacks”. No reasonable judge would ignore this mountain of documented evidence, but Judge Robert P. Patterson had no problem closing the doors of justice in the face of the black concert promoters, Mr. Rowe and the other named plaintiffs.

But all was available for the White concert promoters including meetings in Los Angeles, California and New York City where industry representatives would meet exclusively with the White concert promoters and break the country up into zones and regions where White promoters got exclusive access to all the top acts and artists which the Black concert promoters that operated in those same geographical regions were never made aware of these opportunities at all. This type of conduct constitute overt violations of the Anti Trust provisions of the Sherman Act, in fact Live Nation and AEG both emerged from these illicit, race based transactions.

And don’t forget, the White concert promoters who were not ever required to post an upfront deposit of 50% as the Black concert promoters were, without exception, compelled and required to do for each and every act or artist that they wished to promote.

These contractual practices and procedures were nothing short of deplorable. More than 2000 contracts were presented to Judge Patterson which demonstrated by way of documentation the contractual inequities between White and Black concert promoters.

But in this case, Judge Robert P. Patterson unilaterally determined that neither the law nor the evidence mattered.

Why would a judge, who is supposed to be impartial, make such a ruling in the face of a plethora of evidence that discrimination and anti-trust violations were actually being practiced on a daily basis by The William Morris Agency and Creative Artist Agency (CAA) and other defendants, unless his impartiality had been compromised?

Cases of this magnitude, especially when life altering financial decisions rest in the balance, should not be left up to those whose human sentiment are susceptible to corrupt elements.

This crucial evidence, although paid for by the plaintiffs was intentionally concealed from them by their own corrupt attorneys, Martin Gold and Ray Heslin.

It was not until Mr. Rowe discovered the evidence on the desk of Attorney Ray Heslin that this information and evidence was brought out in open court. And when that happened, Mr. Gold sought to downplay its significance by stating to the court that there was no “credible evidence” a lie that he urged upon the court in order to fleece his clients and enrich himself at his client’s expense.

When Martin Gold received the evidence that the defendants had used the word “nigger” 232 times it was as if he and his law firm had hit the lottery. Only in this instance, Mr. Gold was able to dictate the amount of his winning. Because these rich and powerful defendants would pay any amount necessary to maintain the status quo in the entertainment industry and to insure that this evidence would never see the light of day before a jury in a court of law.

To say that Martin Gold’s actions were deplorable is the ultimate understatement because he violated the time honored principal that he as a lawyer should never betray his client’s interest to enrich himself.

However, even though all of the evidence about black people referred to as “nigger” over 232 times and the clear cut evidence of exclusionary practices that effected all Black concert promoters and the black community adversely, Judge Robert P. Patterson allowed these Jim Crow era practices to continue.

In 2012, there has still not been a black concert promoter that has ever been allowed to book and promote Barbara Streisand, U2 and Bono, Justin Beiber, Elton John, Celine Dion, the Rolling Stones, KISS, “the Boss”, Bruce Springsteen, the Dave Matthews Band, Justin Timberlake, Brittany Spears or any of the other big name White artists, groups and bands. EVER!!!

As a matter of fact, practically all Black concert promoters, because of Judge Robert P. Patterson’s race based ruling, are now either bankrupt or completely out of business.

History is replete with judges undermining the administration of justice in this country by selling out the legitimate claims of black people, who have suffered the indignity of White racist acts of misconduct, only to be thwarted at the doors of justice by another judge who thinks, feels and acts just like the people that committed the atrocious acts being complained of.

And to make matters worse, these judges line their pockets at the expense of the suffering accorded the black litigants whose cases are before them. This is the pitiful epitome of our American justice system that has gone off track and is way wrong. Judge Robert P. Patterson’s actions were both a shame and a profound disgrace.

His name should forever live in infamy much like Chief Justice Roger B. Taney whose deplorable decision in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case (which held that black people have no rights which white people are bound to respect) continues to live in the actions of judges like Robert P. Patterson. He should be brought before the Congress and impeached for his misconduct.

Until America plays by “one set of rules” there will forever be disparities in the justice system. And until there is real fairness, impartiality and an equal application of the law, America will remain a two tier society.

It is obviously evident that corruption reared its ugly head in this case and it should outrage all black people in particular as well as all fair minded and well intentioned people of whatever race, creed or color in general when justice is thwarted and the rights of litigants are subverted by a judge that didn’t care about the proper exercise of his duties, obligations and the oath of office that he swore to uphold the Constitution and laws of the United States.

And let’s not forget about the lawyers Martin Gold and Ray Heslin that lied, manipulated and maligned the plaintiffs in this case.

They too should be disbarred from the practice of law, “tarred and feathered” and then place on display for ridicule and humiliation in the town square to show others that this kind of misconduct premised on racially tinged, Jim Crow tactics of apartheid have no place in the American system of justice.

As the Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. so eloquently states…”injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”.

By the same token, corruption found anywhere in a case before any court undermines the administration of justice in that case and everywhere else unless timely exposed and properly destroyed."

Source of Leonard Rowe, story
http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-724105

Sent to me By Leonard Rowe close friend of Michael Jackson and Legendary Concert Promoter.

The Michael Jackson case has the same elements as small town to big city corruption. The attorneys say what they want, the courts do as they please and the pay to play system gets justice only to those who play the game right, scratch the right backs and have the most money and favors to offer.

Demand Transparency and Accountability. Demand the Judges, Lawyers, Cops, Prosecutors not be Immune and be held accountable for violating our, YOUR constitutional rights.

Read the Leonard Rowe Book for yourself

http://www.whatreallyhappenedtomj.com./

Find out about Sony, and these same corrupt New York Bar, New York Supreme Court, New York Judges, and protected Elite Law Firms involved in iViewit Technology and the theft of a 13 Trillion Dollar patent, lives ruined, cars bombed.. ALL to steal an invention by the Elite Tech and Media companies protected by the New York Courts. http://www.deniedpatent.com/

Don't Forget the WIPO Case I WON with Proskauer Rose Last Summer - Proskauer Rose Law Firm IS not above the Law. Expose Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

2012-01-02T18:16:00.001-08:00

"Gregg M. Mashberg v. Crystal Cox (WIPO Case No. D2011-0677),
Allen Fagin v. Crystal Cox (WIPO Case No. D2011-0678), and
Joseph Leccese v. Crystal Cox (WIPO Case No. D2011-0679)
Filed: April 15, 2011; Decided: June 30, 2011 (Panelists: Robert A. Badgley, Richard G. Lyon [Proskauer Rose LLP case]/Andrew D.S. Lothian [other cases], and Debra J. Stanek)

Disputed domain names: , , , and

proskauerlawfirm.com

The Parties

These complaints were filed by Complainant Proskauer Rose, “one of the largest law firms in the United States,” and by Allen Fagin, Joseph Leccese, and Gregg M. Mashberg. The individual complainants are partners at Proskauer (as its been known since 2000), and have been quoted in various media outlets and named “Super Lawyers” by several publications. They point out that their names appear prominently on the firm’s website and appear in firm promotional materials, and that their names appear on bills sent to clients of the firm.

Respondent Crystal Cox bills herself as an “Investigative Blogger.” According to the Complainants, she shares the views of Eliot Bernstein, who sued Proskauer in 2007 accusing it of “contribut[ing] to the Enron bankruptcy and the presidency of George W. Bush.” She uses the disputed domain names to operate sites that accuse the firm and its attorneys of fraud, theft, corruption, and perjury.

Identical or Confusingly Similar

The Panel finds that Proskauer has rights in the mark PROSKAUER through its registration and use of that mark. The domain name is confusingly similar to Proskauer’s mark, since it merely incorporates the mark and adds the descriptive term “law firm.”

Though individuals can prove trademark rights (even unregistered rights) in their names, the Panel finds that the individual attorneys here failed to do so. The Panel acknowledges that the attorneys are “highly respected, prominent lawyers,” but points out that there is no evidence that they market or provide services independently of the Proskauer firm. Rather, “it appears that the Proskauer firm is the platform on which [they] provide [their] legal services.” Furthermore, there is no evidence that the individual attorneys spent money advertising their names, or billed clients in their own names; nor were they the driving force behind, or the alter ego of, the Proskauer firm.

Cases cited by the Complainants involving trademarks for individual names did not persuade the Panel. Those cases involved a banker whose name was incorporated into the bank name, and a fashion designer who used his personal name in connection with his fashion design business. “The context of an accomplished partner at a prominent, well-known law firm is generally not analogous.”

For those reasons, the Panel finds that the individual attorneys did not have trademark rights in their names sufficient to support a UDRP proceeding.

Rights or Legitimate Interests

“A majority of this Panel maintains that the use of the Domain Name [] here as a genuine ‘gripe site’ vests Respondent with a legitimate interest,” namely, making a fair use of the disputed domain. Though the concept of free speech is not enumerated as a legitimate interest under the Policy, the Panel recognizes that it qualifies as such.

Ultimately, the Panel declines to address these case squarely:

The Panel unanimously believes that this is not a clear case of cyber squatting which the Policy was designed to address. Rather, this looks like a protracted and contentious dispute among numerous parties, several of whom are not before the Panel in this proceeding, that has spilled into the arena of Internet domain names. All parties are free to pursue their respective positions and interests in other fora better suited to consider evidence and grant appropriate relief. As set forth in his concurring opinion, the Panel member who disagrees with the majority’s reasoning on the legitimacy of criticism sites joins the Panel in finding this dispute better suited for the national courts and in the circumstances of this case not appropriate for resolution under the Policy.

In light of the Panel’s decision on the second prong, it declines to consider the third prong.

Decision

The complaint is denied.

Commentary

Lawyers are always being told that they are their own “brand”; I guess this Panel doesn’t read the same marketing books I do. So what can a lawyer do to establish trademark rights in an individual name (short of becoming a named partner)?

For the Panel to find in favor of Proskauer, it would have to get around the free speech/fair use issue. Of course, free speech is not unlimited; defamatory statements are not protected by the Constitution. But the limited scope of the UDRP does not allow the Panel to make the fact-intensive determination of whether the Respondent’s statements are defamatory. Though it was likely worth filing these complaints and taking a shot, Proskauer may need a court to find defamation in order to recover the domains. Otherwise, the gripe sites they point to will likely be considered fair uses."

Source of Crystal Cox Kicks Proskauer Rose's Ass Post
http://the-domain-blog.com/2011/07/08/proskauer-hosed/

Fox News, Rupert Murdoch, Proskauer Rose - Murdoch Media Scandal - Bertram Abrams Proskauer Rose

2012-01-02T18:10:00.001-08:00

Murdoch Media Scandal - the controlling of Media is protected by Proskauer Rose Law Firm. Expose Proskauer Rose Law Firm as they protect corruption, and aid in making victims into criminals. Do NOT believe the jaded perception of Fox News, do your Homework. Blogs are the Real News... Dig Deep.

http://www.democracynow.org/tags/murdoch_media_scandal

Rupert Murdoch was on this Bio and then Seemed to Disappear
http://www.proskauer.com/professionals/bertram-abrams/

Search Engines say this

Bertram A Abrams | Professionals | Proskauer - Proskauer Rose LLP

www.proskauer.com/professionals/bertram-abrams/

Acted as counsel to Rupert Murdoch in his acquisition of five television stations from Metromedia for $1.2 billion, and represented ... 2011 Proskauer Rose LLP.

http://www.proskauer.com/news/press-releases/june-15-2000/

Proskauer Rose, Fox News ~ Guess that's why Fox News wants to discredit Blogger Crystal Cox who has been Exposing Proskauer Rose Crime for Years.

Links to Proskauer Rose Corruption

http://www.proskauerfraud.com/

http://www.josephleccese.com/

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

Proskauer Rose has been hit with a $10 million gender discrimination suit by its former chief financial officer, Elly Rosenthal

2011-12-27T09:43:00.000-08:00

"Proskauer Rose has been hit with a $10 million gender discrimination suit by its former chief financial officer, Elly Rosenthal, who alleges the firm marginalized her and eventually fired her after she took leave for breast cancer treatment (See Complaint).

In Rosenthal v. Proskauer Rose, 111343-11, filed yesterday in Manhattan Supreme Court, Ms. Rosenthal, 57, accuses the firm, which has more 650 attorneys in 12 offices, of demoting her after her medical leave, denying her pay increases and eventually replacing her with a man who was less qualified, despite her 16 years of excellent performance."

Source of Post
http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/PubArticleNY.jsp?id=1202517979128&slreturn=1

Joseph M. Leccese, Proskauer Rose Law Firm - Joseph Leccese Proskauer Rose Lawyer - Proskauer Rose LLP - Joe Leccese

2011-07-03T15:25:00.001-07:00

Joseph M. Leccese -

Joseph Leccese Bio Information.

Joseph M. Leccese is the Chairman of Proskauer Rose Law Firm. and co-head of the Sports Law Group.

Why was Joseph Leccese chosen to be Chairman of Proskauer Rose Law Firm? Got a tip on Chairman of Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Joseph Leccese ( Joe Leccese) ~ Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose is said have had a broad-based corporate practice with particular emphasis on the representation of professional sports leagues, teams and owners; college conferences; and financial institutions that provide capital to the broad array of transactions that occur in the sports industry.

So how does this Qualify Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose to be the Chairman of Proskauer Rose Law Firm, a multi-Billion Dollar Law Firm?

Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Joseph Leccese sports experience is said to includes numerous matters for the National Basketball Association, National Hockey League, Major League Soccer, PAC-12 Conference, ATP Tour and WTA Tour, as well as for a number of individual sports teams, owners and sports-related entities. Some more to Qualify Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Joseph Leccese to be Chairman of Proskauer Rose Law Firm ? What is the REAL Chairman of Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Joseph Leccese Story?

It is said that Joseph Leccese has handled a number of matters relating to the acquisition, financing, operation and equity funding of professional sports teams, including the acquisition of the Washington Nationals for Theodore N. Lerner, the New York Jets for Robert Wood Johnson IV and the Philadelphia Eagles for Jeffrey R. Lurie. Is this what qualifies Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose to be Chairman of Proskauer Rose Law Firm?

Joseph Leccese know of Proskauer Rose's involvement in a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft and Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose LLP Does NOTHING to make this right in ANY way.

Joseph Leccese wanted so badly to STOP you from knowing the Truth about Proskauer Rose Law Firm being involved in Rico Crimes, Massive Shareholder Fraud, Technology Theft, and to cover up the behavior of Proskauer Rose Law Firm that Joseph Leccese sent one of his tip Proskauer Rose Attorneys to defame me, harass me, and try and take millions upon million of dollars of my Intellectual Property to take over the search for the Proskauer Rose name and for Joseph Leccese" - so Joseph Leccese, Proskauer Rose spent big money and lots of time DEFAMING me to "attempt" to take my Domain Name Joseph Leccese .com as well as other Proskauer Rose Sites that I have.

Joseph Leccese lost that Battle. Joseph Leccese now must face the facts that there are over 1200 documents online proving the GUILT of Proskauer Rose Attorneys in the Iviewit Technology Theft. And now Joseph Leccese of Proskauer Rose Law Firm is involved in this RICO Crime, Massive Shareholder Fraud, SEC Complaint, Federal RICO Lawsuit, DOJ Complaint, FBI Complaint and Patent Theft.

Joseph M. Leccese, a New York, New York (NY) Lawyer, Attorney - Intellectual Property, Mergers & Acquisitions, Sports.

Joseph Leccese has been the lead negotiator in multiple stadium and arena deals and financings, including in connection with the facilities developed by the Philadelphia Eagles, New York Jets, New Jersey Devils and Orlando Magic, as well as the arena developed by the NBA in Charlotte. Does that Joseph Leccese experience giv Joseph Leccese what is needed to be the Proskauer Rose Chairman.

Joseph Leccese is said to have represented lenders in connection with a number of facilities-related financings, including the financing for Citi Field. Does that Joseph Leccese experience giv Joseph Leccese what is needed to be the Proskauer Rose Chairman.

Joseph Leccese is said to have handled a variety of joint ventures and other innovative sports transactions, including the formation of NBA China, the WNBA, the NBA Development League and Legends Hospitality, a joint venture among affiliates of the Dallas Cowboys, the New York Yankees and Goldman Sachs. Does that Joseph Leccese experience giv Joseph Leccese what is needed to be the Proskauer Rose Chairman.

Joseph Leccese is said to have broad experience advising on national and international television contracts with major telecasters; the exploitation of Internet, new media and technology rights; and a variety of matters relating to the exploitation of stadia and arenas, including naming rights, seat licenses and related arrangements.

I own ProskauerSucks.com and Proskauer Rose Sucks.com and it seems to me that Proskauer Rose has paid google to silence me, for those blogs will NOT update, not since January. As it is Proskauer Rose pays for 50% of the top search for Proskauer Rose, thing is I own alot of the names in the top search for Proskauer Rose and all their money and bullying has yet to STOP that.

I will continue to examine why those sites won't update, and google may be named in my $450 Million Dollar Proskauer Rose Lawsuit, should a non-Corrupt Court look at my Case.

Got a tip on Proskauer Rose Joseph Leccese ? Email your Joseph Leccese tip to me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Proskauer Rose Law Firm in another Scandal, Anthony Oncidi, Proskauer Rose Ascent Media Group - CaN YOU say RICO ?

2011-07-02T23:33:00.000-07:00

Anthony Oncidi - Proskauer Rose Law Firm

"Former Media Executive Sues Proskauer for Malpractice Over Arbitration

Posted by Brian Baxter
William Frazee, a former vice president at Ascent Media Group, is suing Proskauer Rose and Los Angeles-based partner Anthony Oncidi for allegedly mishandling arbitration matters and having a conflict of interest when representing him, according to sibling publication The National Law Journal.

The civil suit by Frazee was filed against Proskauer and Oncidi, the head of the firm's labor and employment group in L.A., on January 4 in Los Angeles County superior court. The NLJ reports Frazee is seeking more than $500,000 in compensatory damages plus punitive damages.

According to the complaint, Frazee previously held management positions at MGM Studios, United Artists, and Dick Clark Productions. The NLJ reports Frazee worked for Ascent when two women filed separate complaints against him and the company, one of which was a sexual harassment claim that went to arbitration. (Courthouse News has more background on the dispute.)

After settling the disputes with the two women, Ascent claimed in arbitration proceedings that Frazee's conduct was outside the scope of his employment, the NLJ reports, making him liable for $500,000 in attorney's fees and other settlement payments by Ascent.

Frazee claims Proskauer never informed him of any potential fee liability and claims the firm was conflicted in representing both him and Ascent, according to The NLJ.

In an e-mailed statement to The NLJ, Proskauer said Frazee's suit "arises from ongoing litigation between parties and is clearly intended as a tactic in that dispute."

Samuel Smith of Beverly Hills-based SJS Counsel is representing Frazee. Smith told The NLJ that his client is currently unemployed.

The suit against Proskauer comes two weeks after the former CEO of another major entertainment company, James Wiatt of the William Morris Agency (now called William Morris Endeavor after a 2009 merger), sued Winston &; Strawn over the actions of former partner Jonathan Bristol, who was charged by the U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC with fraud on December 16."

Source of Proskauer Rose Post
http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2011/01/proskauer-frazee.html

William Frazee, a former vice president at Ascent Media Group, is suing Proskauer Rose

Web Stats, Fisher and Phillips

2011-07-02T23:15:00.001-07:00

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

IP Address:

Fisher & Phillips. Llp (65.210.158.162) [Label IP Address]

Search Referral:

www.google.com — proskauer rose

Visit Page:

www.proskauersucks.com/

Proskauer Sucks and Proskauer Rose Sucks Blogs

2011-07-02T20:04:00.000-07:00

http://www.proskauerrosesucks.com/

AND

http://www.proskauersucks.com/

Will NOT update in Blogger since January 2011...

is Google Hiding Proskauer Rose Secrets?

Matthew Triggs, Esq. - Proskauer Rose Web Stats - Berger and Singerman

2011-07-02T19:52:00.000-07:00

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

IP Address:

(66.231.254.97)
Search Referral:
www.google.com — Matthew Triggs, Esq.

Entry Page:
www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/01/matthew-triggs-esq-florida-bar.html
Exit Page:
www.ethicscomplaint.com/2010/01/matthew-triggs-proskauer-rose-ethics.html

Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Sucks - Proskauer Rose Lies - Proskauer Rose LLP.

2011-07-01T11:11:00.000-07:00

Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Sucks - Proskauer Rose Lies - Proskauer Rose LLP.

Prokauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Fraud - Proskauer Rose Rico Lawsuit - Proskauer Rose Attorneys with Major Alter Egos, Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

Gregg Mashberg, Allen Fagin, Joseph Leccese, Kenneth Rubenstein, Matthew Triggs.

Proskauer Rose the Truth, every Accounting, Books, Secret Hand Shake, Lies,

Proskauer Rose Law Firm has defamed me, harassed me, lied about me, and violated my Constitutional Rights. Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Prokauer Rose LLP - tons.. so much more coming soon every day FOREVER on Every Single attorney ever to work at Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

Got a Tip on - Prokauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Fraud - Proskauer Rose Rico Lawsuit - Proskauer Rose Attorneys - Proskauer Rose Law Firm ?

Allen Stanford, Connections to Lockheed Martin, Connections to the Governor of New York, Proskauer Rose Whitewashing, Proskauer Rose Political favors or Pay Offs, Proskauer Rose manipulating federal, state and supreme court judges, Proskauer Rose Bullying the Press, Proskauer Rose Attorneys over billing, Proskauer Rose Law Firm lying about billable hours, Proskauer Rose Law Firm and the Thomas V. Sjoblom scandal, Proskauer Rose Law Firm hiding money in the Caymen Islands.

Prokauer Rose LLP secret bank accounts, conspiracies, attempted murders, threatening, harassing.. all of it.. I WANT IT.. email your Prokauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Attorney to me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

"stephen guglielmo" and twin city

2011-06-22T20:43:00.002-07:00

"stephen guglielmo" and twin city

Proskauer Rose LLP Obsession with What Blogger Crystal L. Cox is Saying about Proskauer Rose LLP

2011-06-22T20:43:00.000-07:00

Visitor Analysis & System Spec
Search Referral:	www.google.com — proskauer #12
Host Name:		Browser:	IE 8.0
IP Address:	207.210.181.100 — [Label IP Address]	Operating System:	WinXP
Location:	New York, United States	Resolution:	1024x768
Returning Visits:	1	Javascript:	Enabled
Visit Length:	Multiple visits spread over more than one day	ISP:	Proskauer Rose Llp

Navigation Path

Date	Time	WebPage Show Full URLs
		www.google.com — proskauer #12
3 Mar	13:45:03	www.proskauerfraud.com/
		www.proskauerfraud.com/
3 Mar	13:46:31	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Neuberger%20Berman%20Sale
3 Mar	13:47:41	www.bankruptcymisconduct.com/new/index.php/people/the-bitchslapper.html (Exit Link)
		www.google.com — Above the Law Proskauer lawsuit
9 Mar	13:16:29	www.proskauerfraud.com/2011/01/proskauer-rose-conflict-of-interest-no.html
		www.google.com — mpeg la proskauer #1
11 Mar	12:57:56	www.proskauerfraud.com/2011/02/mpeg-la-involved-in-major-video.html
		www.proskauerfraud.com/2011/02/mpeg-la-involved-in-major-video.html
11 Mar	12:58:18	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Allen%20Fagin
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Allen%20Fagin
11 Mar	12:58:50	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Kenneth%20Rubenstein
		www.google.com — ken rubenstein proskauer
4 Apr	08:13:01	www.proskauerfraud.com/2011/02/mpeg-la-llc-kenneth-rubenstein-corrupt.html
		www.google.com — ken rubenstein proskauer
4 Apr	08:21:19	www.proskauerfraud.com/2011/02/mpeg-la-llc-kenneth-rubenstein-corrupt.html
4 Apr	08:21:41	www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/1999%2002%2018%20Wheeler%20letter%20regarding%20Rubenstein%20review%20of%20p(1).pdf (Exit Link)
		www.google.com — proskauer employee stole #6
14 Apr	14:02:01	www.proskauerfraud.com/2011/02/enter-william-dick-of-foley-to-replace.html
		(No referring link)
14 Apr	14:04:51	www.proskauerfraud.com/2011/02/enter-william-dick-of-foley-to-replace.html
		search.yahoo.com — "proskauer rose"
22 Apr	14:55:04	www.proskauerfraud.com/
		www.google.com — "Proskauer Rose" & "Business Development" November 2010 #12
28 Apr	12:05:59	www.proskauerfraud.com/2010_10_01_archive.html
		www.google.com — "stephen guglielmo" and twin city #2
6 May	08:24:32	www.proskauerfraud.com/2010/03/jp-morgan-chase-travelers-indem-co.html
		www.proskauerfraud.com/2010/03/jp-morgan-chase-travelers-indem-co.html
6 May	08:24:55	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Kenneth%20Rubenstein
		www.google.com — "stephen guglielmo" and twin city #2
6 May	08:25:11	www.proskauerfraud.com/2010/03/jp-morgan-chase-travelers-indem-co.html
		(No referring link)
11 May	09:50:44	www.proskauerfraud.com/2010_11_01_archive.html
		search.pch.com/search?q=proskauer&start=21
20 May	13:03:42	www.proskauerfraud.com/
		www.proskauerfraud.com/
20 May	13:10:01	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Stephen%20Kaye
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Stephen%20Kaye
20 May	13:10:21	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Allen%20Fagin
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Allen%20Fagin
20 May	13:11:14	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Andrew%20Cuomo
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Andrew%20Cuomo
20 May	13:11:31	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Andrew%20M.%20Cuomo
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Andrew%20M.%20Cuomo
20 May	13:12:21	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Bernard%20Madoff
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Bernard%20Madoff
20 May	13:13:46	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Charles%20E.%20Ramos
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Charles%20E.%20Ramos
20 May	13:14:31	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Chief%20Judge%20Judith%20Kaye
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Chief%20Judge%20Judith%20Kaye
20 May	13:16:04	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Gregg%20Mashberg
20 May	13:17:47	www.free-press-release.com/pdf/download/200909/1252249099.pdf (Exit Link)
		www.google.com — "rima moawad" #38
6 Jun	16:02:14	www.proskauerfraud.com/2010/03/neuberger-berman-sale-proskauer-rose.html
		www.proskauerfraud.com/2010/03/neuberger-berman-sale-proskauer-rose.html
6 Jun	16:03:02	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Jeff%20Marwil
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Jeff%20Marwil
6 Jun	16:03:34	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Joseph%20Leccese
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Joseph%20Leccese
6 Jun	16:06:14	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Peter%20Samuels
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Peter%20Samuels
6 Jun	16:06:43	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Quality%20of%20Life
		www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/Quality%20of%20Life
6 Jun	16:07:07	www.proskauerfraud.com/search/label/David%20Grunblatt
		www.google.com — "Ronald Meisburg" #2

Is WIPO, World Intellectual Property Organization acting unEthically to Protect the High Finance Crimes of Proskauer Rose Law Firm? Dawn Osborne Recusal ?

2011-06-17T15:21:00.001-07:00

World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO - in my Alleged OPINION, is helping Proskauer Rose, a Major international law firm, to cover up a decade old technology theft worth 13 Trillion Dollars, while at the same time to get Millons of Dollars worth of search engine placement in one corrupt, conflicted WIPO Decision.

The World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO is supposed to settle domain name disputes Fairly and Neutrally, but really it looks like World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO is an easy way to not have to bribe a judge, manipulate a State Bar, or even go thru the Legal System in any way. Instead WIPO enables those with influence and money, such as Proskauer Rose Law Firm to simply stop the leak of information on what their lawyers are really up to.

WIPO seems to be a way to avoid the law, and previous cases that protect the domain name owner and to simply remove, among others, 3 amazingly strong domain names from the Search Engines that are in the top 10 search for "Proskauer Rose".

Looks to me like Proskauer Rose Law Firm is using WIPO to get out of a 13 Trillion Dollar Liability, a Federal RICO Lawsuit, an International Patent Scandal, a DOJ Complaint, an FBI Investigation, and an Indictment.. while at the same time handing over to Proskauer Rose Law Firm Million of Dollars worth of my work, top search engine placement forever for free and violating my constitutional rights.

It seems to me that Proskauer Rose Law Firm is using an international arbritration system in order to shut me up, because Proskauer Rose Law Firm does not want more hulabaloo in the Amercian Courts where the proof is overwhelming on corruption among Proskauer Rose Law Firm (iViewit, Standford, Enron, Madoff, Varsity Brands and tons More). So Proskauer Rose Law Firm is using WIPO to cover up my Investigative Media Blogs, though I can prove by my web stat counter that Proskauer Rose Law Firm new about these blogs for over 2 years.

Why now is Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Proskauer Rose Attorney engaging Jenifer deWolf Paine to use WIPO, in order to cover up the truth about Proskauer Rose?

Is it because of the break in a 10 year case where the top officials in the Government of New York - the NYAG are being exposed for what really happened and now Proskauer Rose has no more Favors to Call in, so Proskauer Rose is using WIPO, based in Switzerland to Steal the Intellectual Property of a Montana Blogger, Blogging on Proskauer Rose Corruption in the UK, New York, Florida, California and More.

Link to NYAG Exposed

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=588

So Does WIPO Aid and Abet Criminal Activity in the Name of Neutrality and help major corporations to stomp on the rights of those who don't have billions to fight back?

World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO claims that it came to the attention of World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO that the Panelist chosen by Proskauer Rose Law Firm, Dawn Osburne of Palmer Biggs Legal international House had a conflict and has "chosen" to recluse herself.

Proskauer Rose chose Dawn Osburne, Palmer Biggs Legal international House to hand them my Intellectual Property worth Millions upon Millions and to them Worth Trillions as taking these particular domain names with the help of someone the "Inside" at World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO would quiet down the story of how Proskauer Rose Law Firm manipulated the New York Supreme Court, Federal and State Judges, Cops, Investigators, Attorneys, SEC Investigators, DOJ investigators, the USPTO and more in a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft Case. Proskauer Rose wanted their connections, and favortism from Palmer Biggs Legal international House, Dawn Osburne to ensure a WIN for Proskauer Rose to simply take my domain names, no muss .. no fuss.. no rights for me.. just a major law firm trying to control information on the Internet by CHOOSING a supposed "fair and neutral" panelist to decide the fate of my Intellectual Property, Domain Name to "Get Rid Of" the evidence of Proskauer Rose's whitewashing and high finance crimes.

Proskauer Rose knew that Dawn Osburne had a Conflict of Interest, that is Why Proskauer Rose Chose Dawn Osburne. IS this not illegal? My livlihood, my years of work, my asset ... and Proskauer Rose Law Firm conspires to STEAL IT.. and this is Ok? Does WIPO care that Proskauer Rose did this "Obvious" act of contempt? Oh yeah WIPO is not a court of law, oh well Proskauer Rose Still has connections to control them. Proskauer Rose should LOSE automatically for trying to "rig" the outcome of my case.Proskauer Rose did not want clients to read the TRUTH, so they can't stop the TRUTH pretty much, but they can take my names with the help of WIPO Corruption, and a little help from a "Conflicted" Panelist. This way, as Proskauer Rose knows, most people don't search past the first page in Google, so if this Crystal Cox Blogger has 3 Domain Names on the first page of the search engines, well they if we get WIPO, and their inside panelist

Palmer Biggs Legal international House, Dawn Osburne Proskauer Rose Lawyers Really Are.

Proskauer Rose is not looking for a judgement against me, or a court to stop me from talking about them. Proskauer Rose is not manipulating a court to make me stop blogging about the "Alleged" corruption at Proskauer Rose Law Firm. Proskauer Rose, by now knows that I am Brilliant, and Very Good at this Internet Search thing..so Proskauer Rose Attorneys surely know there are thousands of domain names I could buy and continue my supposed "Parroting" of Eliot Bernstein. So it is not about copyright, trademark or competition... it is about covering up the TRUTH about Proskauer Rose's Corruption, whitewashing and crimes. And at the same time the added perk of Search Engine placement worth millions for FREE.

Proskauer Rose has defamed me, Proskauer Rose has flat out lied about me, Proskauer Rose has given legal brief documents to a Domain Arbritration Association that talk about the Iviewit Technology theft and seems to beg for someone, anyone to believe for some reason that Proskauer Rose Attorneys are innocent when there is proof on top of proof that Proskauer Rose is guilty. And the Iviewit Scandal is not the only one I write on. Proskauer Rose, Jenifer Dewolf Paine has degraded me, slammed me, defamed me, lied about me and flapped her mouth quite enough and well with the wall of corruption so high and Proskauer Rose control the courts, I have no doubt that WIPO will simply turn my domain names over to Proskauer Rose Law Firm, however KNOW This, I will still beat you in the Search Engine, I will Still expose the Corruption at Proskauer Rose and the TRUTH will remain the Truth no matter how many people you get to aid and abet your white collar, whitewashing criminal activity, these folks such as Dawn Osburne will simply be added to the ever growing Proskauer Rose Crime Chart.

So just how is Dawn Osborn, Palmer Biggs Legal international House Attorney in a Conflict of Interest with the Prokauer Rose Law Firm? It is my Personal Property, my Years of Work, my TIME, my Money at stake and I request from WIPO a statement from Dawn Osborn, Palmer Biggs Legal international House as to exactly how Dawn Osborn, is conflicted, and WIPO denies me this right. I have a right to Prove that Proskauer Rose engaged in Criminal Activities, I am in a $450 Milion Dollar Lawsuit against Proskauer Rose and these domain names are my asset as well as prove in major federal investigation.

Seems that World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO (Caitlin Tubergen, Case Worker) Claims that it came to their attention there was a conflict, while at the same time seeming to say that Dawn Osborn, Palmer Biggs Legal international House chose to remove herself from the Panel, what is the real story and why have I no right to know?

It seems pretty "Obvious" to me that World Intellectual Property Organization, WIPO (Caitlin Tubergen, Case Worker), Dawn Osborn, Palmer Biggs Legal international House, and Proskauer Rose are doing some back end, sideways and secret deals behind closed doors to take my domain names and in one double dealing, corrupt conflicted sweep the Stealing of My Domain Names, My Intellectual property would discredit the SEC Investigative Reports, Remove evidence from the Internet where my domain names are listed in Federal Court Cases, silence the Truth about Proskauer Rose in top search engine placement and get Proskauer Rose Intellectual Property worth millions that I build over years.

So just how is Proskauer Rose Connected to Dawn Osborn, Palmer Biggs Legal international House? I will be posting tons on that soon. Got a Tip? Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Here are Some eMails from Caitlin Tubergen, Case Worker at WIPO in my Domain Name Proskauer Rose Mafia, Intellectual Property Stealing Case.

****

From: Domain.Disputes@wipo.int

Subject: (CT) D2011-0679 Panelist Recusal
To: crystal@crystalcox.com, jpaine@proskauer.com
Date: Tuesday, June 14, 2011, 5:53 AM

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center

June 14, 2011

Re: Case No. D2011-0679

Dear Parties,

Please be advised that due to a recently identified conflict, it has been necessary for the previously appointed Co-Panelist (Dawn Osborne) to recuse herself from the case.

Accordingly, the Center is now seeking to appoint an alternate Co-Panelist (in accordance with Party preference) to hear the matter on a priority basis, and will revert to the Parties in this regard as soon as possible.

Apologies for any inconvenience caused by delay in this matter.

Sincerely,

Caitlin Tubergen
Case Manager "

Ok so how was this Conflict Identified?

what Was the Conflict? why have I no right to know?Recently Identified My Ass, Dawn Osborne is no longer willing to Be named in my Lawsuit, and Dawn Osborne did not realize I would DEMAND a Conflict of Interest. Dawn Osborne has secrets and was going to favor Proskauer Rose, til she saw how hot all this was getting and did not want to affect her financial status, way of life or professional career.

I, Crystal L. Cox, AGAIN request a Detailed, in Writing Signed statement as to what Conflict of Interest that Dawn Osborne has with Proskauer Rose that Dawn Osborne has to recuse herself from the case. I am already defamed by this, it already hurts my media and what i do for a living, if Proskauer Rose was pulling in a "favor" to shut me up, I have a right to know.

Caitlin Tubergen, Case Manager - WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center seems to think that I do not have a right to this information regarding my asset, my quality of life, my business, my asset and legal case.

The Recusal reason is major in my legal action in this issue, for if Proskauer Rose Picked Dawn Osborne, than obviously Proskauer Rose was trying to pull in a favor to steal my domain names. I have no sure way to know that Dawn Osborne is not influencing others on the panel. I have Firmly requested that the NEW panelists sign a Conflict of Interest Form, so far Caitlin Tubergen, Case Manager - WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center refuses me this right saying that it is not Standard of Practice. This asset is MY PROPERTY, just like a building, real estate, gold .. my life's work, my money, my time and its NOT standard of practice for a WIPO panelist member to swear in writing and sign to the fact that they are in no way favoring the complainant, have not had dealings with them, have no personal or business relationship in ANY way... are YOU Kidding.. well that basically says that WIPO can do what they want, favor who they want and Answers to NO ONE and in the name of Fair and Neutral Decision.. that is Simply Bullshit !!

Do I seem to "Aggressive" .. well if you had a property worth Millions and a Corrupt Law Firm was pulling in favors to steal it and you had no rights it seemed, the least you would do is tell your story for all to see what is really going on behind the scenes.

I will in NO WAY take this passively, even when and if WIPO gives you my Domain Names I will still Stomp your Ass in the Search Engines, and I will Still get iViewit heard as well as many others that Proskauer Rose Attorneys have made victims of. You will not Silence me thru ANY action, not Even Death will Silence what I have built to EXPOSE YOU.

I am telling the Truth, I am on the Right side of the Moral Compass, I am standing up for Inventors Rights and For Victims Rights... I am an investigative blogger and very good at it, and I will not back down to you Proskauer Rose. NO Way, No How.. So Call Eliot Bernstein, Fix This... and Do the Right Thing .. By Law..

****

If Proskauer Rose did PICK Dawn Osborne to favor Proskauer Rose Law Firm, then this also should be noted, proved and used in SEC Complaints, a Federal RICO Lawsuit and other Legal Action against Proskauer Rose that includes these domain names in Federal Complaints, Legal Briefs and other Documents of Evidence.

IF Dawn Osborne, or any other panelist, or anyone at WIPO including Caitlin Tubergen is proven in conspiracy with Proskauer Rose,then they are indeed Liable, and may also face criminal charges. Obviously you can understand my need for in writing signed proof from Dawn Osborne as to why she recused her self and this far into the procedure. Much suspicion has arising. And yet WIPO, Caitlin Tubergen seems to think its none of my business why Dawn Osborne is no longer in charge of my fate. Oh and Surely the New Guy Robert A. Badgley is neutral. I mean if WIPO Case Manger, Caitlin Tubergen says that Robert A. Badgley is going to be fair and neutral well then surely Robert A. Badgley is right?

I Intend to turn over every stone on Robert A. Badgley, and if there is a Proskauer Rose Connection I will find it, prove it and EXPOSE IT !!

WIPO Case Manger, Caitlin Tubergen says I did not pick a Preference of panelist in this case. Thing is I don't know any of these folks, why would I. And if WIPO Case Manger, Caitlin Tubergen is telling the TRUTH and the panelist are fair and not biased, then why would I have to?

I would assume that I would be treated fair and neutral, however given the way this is playing out and how long it took Dawn Osborne to admit her conflict and Dawn Osborne only admitted conflict due to my online writings, and my constant asking, otherwise Dawn Osborne would have just favored Proskauer Rose and aided and abetted Proskauer Rose Law Firm to Steal my Intellectual Property. WIPO would never have asked a question on any of it.

This decision, the panelists, the back story, every detail will play out for years. So I hope that all are really neutral, as Proskauer Rose is bullying me and I will stand up for my rights even if WIPO discriminates against me and takes my Intellectual Property even in light of the TaubmanSucks.com case and the Mike Morgan Vs. Goldman Sachs case, WIPO is still helping Proskauer Rose to come for my PROPERTY. This story will NEVER go away. Fact is Fact. Truth is TRUTH.

If Proskauer Rose takes these names, WIPO has set a precedence that attempts to overturn the intellectual property laws. This will be exposed. Also if WIPO take my domain names this will directly impact my Financial Status, and WIPO panelists and key players will be named in legal action, period.

I have demanded that the remaining panelists sign an affirmation that they, nor family members have EVER had ANY dealings with anyone at or related to Proskauer Rose in any way, if Not WIPO and the Panelists will be Liable. I am denied this right by WIPO.

More Emails from WIPO

--- On Wed, 6/15/11, Disputes, Domain wrote:From: Disputes, Domain

Subject: RE: (CT) D2011-0679 Panelist Recusal
To: "Crystal L. Cox"
Cc: "jpaine@proskauer.com"
Date: Wednesday, June 15, 2011, 8:04 AM
Dear Ms. Cox,

Further to your attached email, to clarify, Ms. Osborne has recused herself due to a self-identified potential conflict of interest in that it appears that her firm has previously acted for or in connection with the Complainant. The recusal and appointment of an alternate panelist is to protect perceptions of the Panel’s independence overall.

Obviously the recusal of Ms. Osborne has no impact on the presiding Panel (Robert A. Badgley) or the Panel nominated to serve, in the absence of any preference expressed by you, as the Respondent’s co-panel (Debra J. Stanek).

It is not WIPO Center practice to require signed statements from recusing panelists as to their stated reasons regarding panel recusal.

We trust the above has answered your questions and allays any concerns you may have.

Sincerely,

Caitlin Tubergen
Case Manager "

Oh Gee Well that certainly "clears it up" .. clarify's the whole deal.. whew.. THANKS...

So Dawn Osborne recused HERSELF? so does WIPO do any due diligence on these guys, or is it a free for all, who ever wants somebody's domain name can just call one of the 1500 WIPO panelist and pull some strings and WIPO does no research on it, and in this jeapordized millions in my asses, my livelihood and my quality of life and this is Legal? Fair? Neutral? Ethical? I Don't Think So.

Caitlin Tubergen - Case Manager - WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center says, in Regard to the Dawn Osborne Recusal on my case .. that Dawn " Osborne has no impact on the presiding Panel (Robert A. Badgley) " - SO does "Dawn Osborne" or anyone at or related to Proskauer Rose Law Firm

Caitlin Tubergen - Case Manager - WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center, Also States to Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox that.. and I Quote "It is not WIPO Center practice to require signed statements from recusing panelists as to their stated reasons regarding panel recusal. " Well it damn well better be, people will sue you all ... Domain Names are worth more then real estate in many cases. Your Decisions affect peoples lives, wallets, quality of life and financial portfolio. These people have a right to the TRUTH.

So this is why Proskauer Rose Law Firm did not sue me to take my domain names, or get me into any court of law. See the Corrupt Elite Attorney Fraternity at Proskauer Rose led in this case by Jenifer deWolf Paine on behalf of Matthew Triggs, Joseph Leccese, Gregg M. Mashberg, Kenneth Rubenstein and the Proskauer Rose Law Firm has simply used WIPO in order for this not to get messy and to darn expensive and to ensure a swift win, and not years of a court battle. This way Proskauer Rose .. Matthew Triggs, Joseph Leccese, Gregg M. Mashberg, Kenneth Rubenstein and the Proskauer Rose Law Firm can get those names out of search quickly so the investigators don't see and the clients don't see.

An ASSET of this value and it is not Standard of Practice for WIPO to ask for a conflict of interest agreement or a signed statement as to why the panelist is recusing themselves, no Wonder the Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm took this route, it is much easier then doing the right thing, obeying the law, and having any kind of ethics when STEALING a domain name and silencing a blogger.

Caitlin Tubergen - Case Manager - WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ends my Intellectual Property Rights Violated email with "We trust the above has answered your questions and allays any concerns you may have."

SO who is the WE that Caitlin Tubergen - Case Manager - WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center is talking about? And no that certainly does NOT answer my question nor anywhere near address my Concern.

A major multi-billion dollar international law firm does not like the FACT that I have 3 domain names in the top 10 for Internet Searches for their name and they are just going to take them, whatever favors they need to call in to do it and WIPO does not even raise an eyebrow.

Also Not the the Reclusal was after this post and others calling them out

http://www.industrywhistleblower.com/2011/06/jenifer-dewolf-of-proskauer-rose-wants.html

Keep in mind Caitlin Tubergen, WIPO Saying "Obviously the recusal of Ms. Osborne has no impact on the presiding Panel (Robert A. Badgley)" so that when I prove this flat out wrong, Caitlin Tubergen, WIPO will be Liable. Oh and don't worry about denying me the "reasons for reclusal" I will find out and I will post it.

Todays Email from Caitlin Tubergen, WIPO

"Dear Ms. Cox,

The Center acknowledges receipt of your below email, and kindly reminds the parties that all case-related communications should be copied to the other party in accordance with the UDRP Rules.

As previously communicated, you may note that the Center is currently in the process, in light of Ms. Osbourne's previously-advised recusal on the basis stated, of inviting an alternate Co-Panelist for Complainant's nominee in accordance with paragraph 6 of the UDRP Rules.

As a pre-requisite for appointment, such Panelist would need to submit the necessary Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, a copy of which is publically available on the Center's website.

We will advise both Parties of the relevant appointment shortly.

Sincerely,

Caitlin Tubergen

Case Manager

WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center "

Note to Caitlin Tubergen, WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center : Please note if you want the lying Bitch Jenifer DeWolf Paine to have a copy of my Rights Violating case that Proskauer Rose, Jenifer DeWolf Paine initiated on behalf of Matthew Triggs, Joseph Leccese, Gregg M. Mashberg, Kenneth Rubenstein and the Proskauer Rose Law Firm then you can forward it to her. I have no Obligation to add the email in as a Copy to WIPO, the Fair and Neutral Arbitration Association. Nor to I "Obviously" expect to be treated Fair and Neutral, as the Proof is Piling up that there is NO fair and neutral at WIPO.

******

Dawn Osborne Prokauer Rose Connections, more coming soon..

Here are a Few Research Links on Dawn Osborne for now

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/panel/profiles/osborne-dawn.pdf

http://www.fastiis.org/resources/guidance/legal/legalMediationPanel/Dawn%20Osborne.pdf

http://www.clt.co.uk/brochures/cf40709.pdf

Much More Coming Soon ( Gotta wonder though if she is so great at Intellectual Property Laws and Domain Names.. why don't she own

http://www.DawnOsborne.com/ and if its wrong to own the name of another why not just take it from the person who does.. Proskauer Rose thinks that Josephe Leccesse and Gregg Mashberg have that right as if they are the only ones in the world with that name.. so why not Dawn Osborne?

Research Links on Proskauer Rose Corruption

http://www.stolentechnology.com/2010/12/criminal-complaint-against-nyag-andrew.html

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

http://www.proskauerfraud.com/

http://www.proskauersucks.com

Us Dept Of Justice searches "stanford proskauer rose sjoblom"

2011-06-17T12:31:00.001-07:00

Washington, District of Columbia, United States

IP Address:

Us Dept Of Justice (149.101.1.119) [Label IP Address]

Search Referral:

www.google.com — stanford proskauer rose sjoblom

Visit Page:

www.proskauersucks.com/search/label/Thomas%20V.%20Sjoblom

MPEG LA Patent Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein STEALS Patent Licenses for MPEG LA to Illegally Patent Pool

2011-06-17T12:30:00.001-07:00

Kenneth Rubenstein, Corrupt Patent Attorney from Proskauer Rose Law Firm

on Patent Licensing.

" Patent Licensing:

We have unique patent licensing experience, having worked on the most complicated patent licensing programs ever undertaken. In particular, we counsel clients about the infringement by potential licensees of patents and participate in discussions with potential licensees to explain why a license for particular patents is needed. We also have assisted in the negotiation and formation of patent pools and the successful signing of licensees to pool licenses, resulting in the collection of billions of dollars in royalties."

Source

http://www.proskauer.com/professionals/kenneth-rubenstein/

What Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP Is Really Saying is, Our Unique Patent Licensing Program is to STEAL really Good Video Technology, then Illegally Pool it at Patent Pools with our Partners in Crime at MPEG LA.

Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP has a Unique Patent Licensing Program of Controlling or Buying off Supreme Court Judges, Controlling the New York Attorney General then Andrew Cuomo some how ( who is now the New York Governor), and Controlling, Somehow the U.S. Patent Office, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the SEC and Supreme Court Proceedings in New York and Florida as Well as the Eureopean Patent Office. This Certainly is a Unique Patent Licensing Program

Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP steals patents from the REAL Inventors and "Co-Licenses" with Criminals such as MPEG LA. There are over 1200 documents of Proof all posted online and Proskauer Rose Law Firm so Far controls the United States Justice System on Every Level, Seemingly.

More on the MPEG LA, Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP Stealing the iViewit Technology at the Links Below.

http://www.alexisdevane.com/

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

posted here by Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Fighting for Inventors Rights

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Matthew Triggs Proskauer Rose LLP named in SEC Complaint

2011-06-17T12:29:00.001-07:00

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

Does Proskauer Rose go to WIPO to take information of their crimes off the Wall Street Journal Site..

2011-06-17T12:28:00.001-07:00

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/28/sjoblom-proskauer-rose-face-fallout-from-stanford-affair/

nope.. Proskauer Rose is Selectively prosecuted me for what so many others are doing.. and WIPO seems to be enabling them to do so..

Proskauer Rose LLP Googling Ian Blumenstein - Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law Firm Obsessed with Googling Ex. Proskauer Attorney Ian Blumenstein.

2011-06-17T12:27:00.002-07:00

New York, United States

IP Address:

Proskauer Rose Llp (207.210.181.100) [Label IP Address]

Search Referral:

www.google.com — ian blumenstein

Visit Page:

www.investigativeblogger.com/2011/05/ian-b-blumenstein-got-tip-on-proskauer.html

Why is Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law Firm obsessed with searching "Ian Blumenstein" ?

What Does Ian Blumenstein know that Ian Blumenstein took to Cooley?

http://www.law360.com/articles/182736/cooley-hooks-proskauer-capital-markets-partner

Surely Ian Blumenstein, a High Yield Debt manager has some Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law Firm secrets. It seems to me that as in the iViewit scandal, Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law Firm has some High Yield Debt and Bankruptcy Corruption Secrets.

So got a tip on High Yield Debt manager Ian Blumenstein formerly of Proskauer Rose LLP - PProskauer Rose Law Firm? Or a tip on Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law?

Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law Firm must have something MAJOR to hide as much as Proskauer Rose LLP - Proskauer Rose Law Firmsearches my blogs for Ian Blumenstein.

Proskauer Rose, Complaintant gets to Choose the panel to TAKE my Domain Names?

2011-06-17T12:27:00.000-07:00

Proskauer Rose law firm claims I registered Domain Names in bad faith, not true, as my domain names

were registered to discuss Proskauer Rose on many levels, the main one being all the connections Proskauer Rose has in the iViewit Stolen technology.

I write on many subjects, attorneys, business, and more and this is part of how I do business. Proskauer Rose decides that is not right and so they move to take the domain names I blog on, thing is there are many other bloggers out there, and the Truth will remain "out there" about Proskauer Rose.

So here is the Panel that Proskauer Rose CHOSE, to come for Me.. what rights do I, one blogger have in this playing field ? So what are the Conflicts of Interest with Proskauer Rose and these Folks? Got a tip, email it to me at Crystal@CrystalCox.com

COMPLAINANT'S THREE MEMBER PANEL ELECTION

Complainant Proskauer Rose LLP hereby nominates the following Panelists:

Dawn Osborne

Palmer Biggs Legal

International House

174 Three Bridges Road

Crawley

West Sussex RH10 1LE

United Kingdom

Telephone:+441293 SS3 000

Steven M. Auvil

Benesch, Friedlander, Coplan Ik Aranoff LLP

2300 BP Tower

200 Public Square

Cleveland OH 44144-2378

Telephone: 216. 363. 4686

William R. Towns

slovak Druce & Quigg LLP

Wells Fargo Plaza

1000 Louisiana

Fifty Third Floor

Houston, TX 77002

Telephone: 713. 571. 3400

Proskauer Rose makes Desperate attempt to cover up massive secrets and decades of corruption by taking Blogger's Domain Names.

2011-06-17T12:25:00.002-07:00

Proskauer Rose is so afraid of all their secrets pouring out as the Spitzer Secrets come to light and the NYAG secrets of Andrew Cuomo Come to Light and the Whitewashing to protect big time New York Attorneys exposes Proskauer, they are scrambling and they want investigative blogger Crystal L. Cox to the collateral damage of a war that she is only reporting on and is no part of.

My blogs post stories on Proskauer Rose and their connections to Criminals and Proskauer Rose wants to silence me so they are fighting for my domain name.

Proskauer Rose is Tied to corruption in the NYAG, corruption over Enron's Collapse, and has been protected by the New York and Florida Bar and Supreme Courts and they don't want top of the search engine truth out there so they are coming for my blogs to shut me up, to silence the Truth, to STOP free speech and to STOMP on all Blogger's Rights by singling me out to take my Domain Names for writing stories on Proskauer Rose. And the stories were not about me, many send me tips on Proskauer Rose and I registered domain names to post these stories

All Bloggers must protest as this is a major Law Firm coming in and saying hey you can't write negative stuff on us, even its true or we will make WIPO (UDRP) give us your domain names, yet Proskauer Rose can register names and hire peopel to register names to fluff up the good press that Proskauer Rose Law firm wants you to see..

It is alleged that Proskauer Rose's connections to Cuomo, Spitzer, ex- Mayor Giuliani, Dietrich Snell and more all relate to the 9/11 Comission Derailing. I write on bits and pieces and Proskauer Rose Law Firm Complains to WIPO to take my domain names. To Single Me out and take my names, Why? To STOP you from finding out the TRUTH about Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

Crystal L. Cox

Investigative Blogger

Is it Illegal if I Say that Jenifer deWolf Paine, Proskauer Rose Attorney is a Dumb Bitch? Is that Opinion, Defamation, Slander or Fact?

2011-06-17T12:25:00.000-07:00

What if I Can Prove that Jenifer deWolf Paine, Proskauer Rose Attorney is a Flat Out for a Fact Dumb Bitch, will that get me Sued? Will Jenifer deWolf Paine, Proskauer Rose Law Firm stomp her feet and take my Domain Name ? Will it piss Proskauer Rose, Corrupt Law Firm Off so Bad that they take away my "Birthday"? Anyone who is Literate, can see that Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein perjured himself over the Iviewit Technology Scandal. Anyone with a Brain can read the documents on the Iviewit case and see that Proskauer Rose Law Firm was involved in STEALING a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent and in the Collapse of Enron as well as many other Multi-Billion Dollar Scandals.

So why in the world does Ms. Thing, Jenifer deWolf Paine have her panties all in a wad over a few of my Domain Names, does Jenifer deWolf Paine not have bigger fish to fry? Seriously, Jenifer deWolf Paine cannot really believe that Proskauer Rose is entitled to my Intellectual Property nor that Proskauer Rose Law Firm is innocent in the iViewit Case? And well if Jenifer deWolf Paine does believe this well then YEP have to Go with "Dumb Bitch" . .sorry.. Dumb is Fact, Bitch is well. "in my Opinion"..

oh and Hey thanks for Stopping by to Hang on my "Every Word" . .Love Ya..

Crystal L. Cox

aKa Mad Dog Blogger ~ Crazy Crystal Cox....

the TRUTH about Corrupt Proskauer Rose Law Firm.

U.S. Patent And Trademark Office - USPTO Researching Sites on iViewit Technologies Stolen Technology.

2011-06-17T12:24:00.000-07:00

Proskauer Rose Law Firm is guilty in a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent Theft. Read the Documents at www.Iviewit.Tv - listen to the perjured deposition of Proskauer Rose Attorney Kenneth Rubenstein and it is easy to see that Proskauer Rose was involved in the stealing of a 13 Trillion Dollar Patent.

So why is Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose Law Firm using WIPO to cover up a serious criminal conspiracy. And why is Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose throwing such a tantrum and accusing me of a late answering to the frivolous ILLEGAL complaint of Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose in order to steal my Domain Names so that a Multi-Billion dollar law firm can get top search engine placement x Two from my years of work, my time, my money ?

Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose Law Firm simply wants to STEAL my domain names. Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose lies to WIPO about the involvement of Proskauer Rose Law Firm in the Iviewit case and Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose accuses me of "parroting" Eliot Bernstein, owner of iViewit, Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose defames me, flat out lies about me and I defend myself and Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose wants to make sure and get the last word as one of the worlds largest law firms stomps on Free Speech Rights, on my Civil Rights, on my Media Rights, and flat out uses WIPO to steal a number of VERY valuable assets bought, built and maintained by me Crystal L. Cox - Investigative Blogger.

See the Proskauer Rose motto is we can't figure this Intellectual Property Stuff out of this here internet marketing thing, so we will just steal other people's intellectual property and make big money from it.

Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose know flat out that I use those domain names as a way to expose the corruption in the Proskauer Rose Law Firm and not just on the iViewit Case and Federal RICO Lawsuit pending over it, but also on other tips I get on the conspiracies, crimes and cover ups of Proskauer Rose Lawyers. Yet Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose keeps coming for me to shut me up via STEALING my Intellectual Property.

Proskauer Rose Law Firm is Thugs, Bully's and Proskauer Rose LLP is using their political clout, their money, their corporate elite power to STOMP on my rights as a blogger, an investigative reporter, a property owner, a business owner and someone who is simply MEDIA exposing tips on Proskauer Rose and yes READING other people's sites, documents, and court cases to "parrot" these cases on my blog and get them found in the search engines.
Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose knows that Proskauer Rose has hired Reputation Defender to come after me in the search engines, yet tells WIPO its all about me competing and other lies that have nothing to do with the FACT that these are my properties, built and owned by me and Proskauer Rose LLP has known of these sites for over 1.5 years as is proven by my statcounter.

So why is Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose coming after me now? Most likely because Proskauer Rose's time is up, no more hiding behind the delicate, teetering, yet very high wall of corruption in New York and Florida and no more hiding behind the skirt of ex-Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye, oh and the gig is up for ex NYAG Andrew Cuomo who is now governor - so who does Proskauer Rose Law Firm turn to in order to STOP the truth from getting out? Well apparently WIPO, in order to simply take the domain names of those exposing the corruption, cover ups, crimes and conspiracies of Proskauer Rose.

Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose whiny, bitchy email to WIPO ... Factual Inaccuries? what about the Flat about lies in the complaint to WIPO by Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose, in order to Steal my Domain names. And what does WIPO have to do with the crimes and accuses of crimes regarding Proskauer Rose or me, as Media writing on these issues. WIPO is not a court of law, STICK to the Facts Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose and stop trying to get WIPO involved in the 13 Trillion Dollar Liability of Proskauer Rose.

As when Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose gets WIPO to do this dirty deed then WIPO will be Liable, in conspiracy for suppressing media and the TRUTH on massive shareholder fraud, Federal RICO Crimes, SEC Crimes, USPTO crimes, crimes against the federal government and more. WIPO surely will read the 1200 documents at iViewit.TV before putting their name on this massive liability, as WIPO will be named in future legal action for the facts are the facts and if Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose recruits WIPO, in conspiracy to hide these white collar crimes, well then those on the WIPO panel and WIPO in general will be liable.

Also keep in mind I demanded those at WIPO sign a conflict of interest form to ensure there is no favortism for a multi-billion dollar law firm and WIPO has not complied, this could lead to future criminal complaints against those individuals. Also keep in mind that the iViewit Case is international and just because WIPO panelists are out of country that has no bearing on the liability of WIPO in this case. So we continue the David and Goliath store of Jenifer deWolf of Proskauer Rose fighting for the domain names of an investigative blogger, ME - Crystal L. Cox, to Shut me Up. Stay Tuned, as long as Proskauer Rose Law Firm exists,

"From: "Paine, Jenifer deWolf" <JPaine@proskauer.com>
Date: Jun 7, 2011 4:31 PM
Subject: D2011-0675 - ProskauerLawFirm.com [PR-CURRENT.FID943193]
To: <Domain.Disputes@wipo.int
Cc: <crystal@crystalcox.com

Complainant is in receipt of Registrant's Response.

Although there is no automatic right to a Reply, due to the nature of Respondent's untimely Response, Complainant is requesting that the Panel allow it to submit a short (no more than one page) Reply to address certain legal assertions and factual inaccuracies contained in Registrant's Response.

We will await word from the Panel as to whether it will entertain such a Reply.

Thank you.

Jenifer deWolf Paine Senior Counsel

Proskauer

Eleven Times Square
New York, NY 10036-8299
d 212.969.3016
f 212.969.2900
jpaine@proskauer.com "

More on the iViewit Stolen Technology at

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

http://www.alexisdevane.com/